UNDERSTANDING THE CONSERVATIVE PROMISE: MANDATE FOR LEADERSHIP
Project 2025 Watch
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
VS
CONSTITUTION
Chapter 29: INDEPENDENT REGALTORY AGENCIES-
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Review
Reading Mandate with Summary
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is tasked with enforcing campaign finance laws while safeguarding First Amendment rights. It operates independently, limiting presidential influence, and faces challenges in balancing enforcement with fairness.
Key Points Across Both Transmissions:
Mission and Enforcement: The FEC regulates political speech and activity, with civil enforcement authority, while the DOJ handles criminal enforcement. Ambiguities in FECA create challenges for fair enforcement.
Nomination Process: The President appoints commissioners, confirmed by the Senate, with bipartisan cooperation ensuring smooth confirmations. However, commissioners often serve beyond their terms, defying congressional intent.
Litigation and Guidance: The FEC's independent litigating authority has led to defaults in court due to internal disagreements. The President could direct the DOJ to defend the FEC or recommend legislative changes to transfer litigation authority. Clear guidance on FECA provisions affected by court decisions is needed.
Legislative Recommendations: Timely nominations to the FEC, raising contribution limits, and indexing reporting requirements to inflation are suggested reforms. Opposing efforts to reduce the number of commissioners is crucial to prevent partisan enforcement.
Overenforcement Concerns: Former FEC Chairman Bradley Smith emphasized the chilling effect of overenforcement on political speech and volunteer activities. Enforcement should be fair, nonpartisan, and protective of First Amendment rights.
Conclusion: The FEC and DOJ must ensure enforcement aligns with First Amendment protections and avoids overreach. Legislative changes and clear guidance are essential to address ambiguities and improve fairness in campaign finance regulation. The President plays a pivotal role in shaping these reforms and ensuring balanced enforcement.
Chapter 29: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
PAGE 861-868
AUTHOR: Hans A. von Spakovsky
AUTHOR BACKGROUND CHECK:
Hans A. von Spakovsky plays a pivotal role in Project 2025, a policy blueprint crafted by the conservative Heritage Foundation to reshape the executive branch should a Republican win the White House in 2024. As a senior legal fellow at Heritage and a long-time advocate for election integrity laws, von Spakovsky has helped draft and promote the project's legal and electoral policy agenda. His contributions emphasize dismantling what he and allies see as the administrative state and reinforcing presidential control over federal agencies. He advocates for purging career civil servants viewed as obstructive to conservative reforms, and he supports appointing ideologically aligned personnel through mechanisms like Schedule F—effectively politicizing what has historically been nonpartisan civil service roles.
Within the broader conservative political movement, von Spakovsky has served as a legal architect of voter ID laws and stricter election oversight, laying the foundation for Republican strategies to challenge election processes and outcomes. Through Heritage and affiliated platforms, he has repeatedly pushed narratives about widespread voter fraud—claims that have been widely debunked by bipartisan election officials and courts. Nevertheless, these narratives have influenced state-level legislation and provided justification for proposed executive orders in the Project 2025 framework. His long-standing involvement in Republican election law, combined with his work in the Department of Justice and the FEC, positions him as both a thought leader and tactical strategist in the movement to centralize executive authority and restrict perceived liberal influence in federal governance.
Understanding what this part of the Mandate means to you?
🛡️ Importance of Independent Electoral Commissions
Independent electoral commissions are responsible for:
Administering elections: Organizing and overseeing the electoral process to ensure it is conducted fairly and efficiently. Enforcing electoral laws: Ensuring compliance with laws governing elections, including campaign financing and advertising.Certifying results: Officially declaring election outcomes based on transparent and accurate vote counting.Regulating political parties: Overseeing party registration and adherence to legal requirements.
Their independence ensures that these functions are performed without political bias, fostering public confidence in electoral outcomes.
Federal Election Commission Breakdown
Best/Worst Parts of the Mandate FEC
Best Proposals:
Timely Nominations: Prioritizing the nomination of commissioners to prevent overstays and ensure the FEC operates as intended.
Clear Guidance on FECA: Recommending the FEC or DOJ provide updated guidance on statutory provisions affected by court decisions to reduce confusion.
Opposition to Structural Changes: Advocating against reducing the number of commissioners, which could lead to partisan enforcement.
Raising Contribution Limits: Suggesting higher limits and indexing them to inflation to reduce unnecessary burdens on candidates and parties.
Fair Enforcement: Emphasizing the need for enforcement that protects First Amendment rights and avoids overreach.
Worst Proposals:
Independent Litigating Authority Removal: Proposing to transfer the FEC's litigating authority to the DOJ, which could undermine the agency's independence.
Overemphasis on Bipartisan Pairing: Relying heavily on bipartisan traditions for nominations, which may not always ensure the best candidates.
Ambiguity in Enforcement: Failing to address the root causes of ambiguous provisions in FECA, leaving room for inconsistent application.
Resistance to Nonpartisan Leadership: Opposing efforts to introduce a nonpartisan or independent chair, which could enhance fairness.
Limited Focus on Small Committees: Overlooking the unique challenges faced by small committees and grassroots campaigns in navigating complex regulations.
Let me know if you'd like me to expand on any of these points!
History of Federal Election Commission
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is an independent agency established in 1975 to enforce the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), which governs fundraising and spending in federal campaigns. While the FEC handles civil enforcement, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) oversees criminal enforcement. The FEC operates independently of the executive branch, limiting presidential authority over its actions.
Key points include:
Mission and Challenges: The FEC regulates political speech and Activity, touching on sensitive First Amendment rights. Former Commissioner Bradley Smith emphasized its deep implications for free speech and association.
Nomination Process: The President appoints six commissioners, confirmed by the Senate, with no more than three from the same party. Traditionally, bipartisan cooperation ensures smooth confirmations. However, this tradition has been broken once.
Current Commissioners: As of 2025, five commissioners' terms will have expired or are about to expire. Notably, Ellen Weintraub has served beyond her term since 2007. Republican commissioners advocate for limited regulation to protect First Amendment rights.
Needed Reforms: The President must ensure nominees align with the principles of current Republican commissioners and negotiate with Senate leaders to avoid extreme views that could restrict political speech.
DOJ's Role: The President can influence DOJ's criminal enforcement of FECA through appointments. The DOJ should avoid prosecuting ambiguous cases and align its actions with FEC interpretations to ensure fairness.
Countries that Mimic the Playbook
🌍 Countries with Weak Electoral Commissions
Several countries have electoral commissions that lack independence, leading to compromised electoral integrity:
Venezuela: The National Electoral Council (CNE) has been criticized for being dominated by pro-government officials, leading to allegations of electoral manipulation and suppression of opposition parties.
Russia: Elections have faced scrutiny due to the exclusion of independent observers and the presence of government-appointed monitors, raising concerns about transparency and fairness.
Zimbabwe: During elections, independent monitors have been arrested, and there have been reports of significant delays and irregularities, undermining the credibility of the electoral process.
Ethiopia: The 2015 general elections were marred by reports of harassment of opposition parties and censorship, leading to questions about the impartiality of the electoral board.
Papua New Guinea: The electoral commission has been criticized for neglect and lack of capacity, resulting in poorly managed elections and diminished public trust.
Podcast Sign Up
News listing
By checking this box, I consent to receive transactional messages related to my account, orders, or services I have requested. These messages may include appointment reminders, order confirmations, and account notifications among others. Message frequency may vary. Message & Data rates may apply.Reply HELP for help or STOP to opt-out.
By checking this box, I consent to receive marketing and promotional messages, including special offers, discounts, new product updates among others. Message frequency may vary. Message & Data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help or STOP to opt-out.
Understanding How the Mandate Effects Our Government by Sections of the Mandate
The following is a breakdown of the 900+ pages in a deeper breakdown of the authors, the standards, diagnosing the reforms, deep understanding of what our tax payer dollars provide and a deeper understanding of the deep Right. We do not have a deep Left issue, we have a issue with those who are lacking credibility with plans that are outlined in black and white. Instead of just living through the next 4 years, learn from America's Mistake for allowing nepotism to override political career morally sound individuals to decide people's fate versus those who are born of privilege. In these library of collective thoughts please feel free to join the movement...
Monitoring the Mandate by diving into the authors, contributors and current implementation of the project 2025 mandate created in 1978 first ran by Ronald Raegan with the Heritage Foundation.
Understanding the fundamentals of the Mandate by diving into the theories, philosophies and breakdowns from the section "Taking the Reins of Government" with break downs from
Understanding the fundamentals of the Mandate by diving into the theories, philosophies and breakdowns from the section "The Common Defense" with break downs from:
Understanding the fundamentals of the Mandate by diving into the theories, philosophies and breakdowns from the section "The General Welfare" with break downs from:
Understanding the fundamentals of the Mandate by diving into the theories, philosophies and breakdowns from the section "The Economy" with break downs from:
Understanding the fundamentals of the Mandate by diving into the theories, philosophies and breakdowns from the section "Independent Regulatory Agencies" with break downs from:
Understanding the fundamentals of the Mandate by diving into the theories, philosophies and breakdowns from the section "Onward" with break down and final thoughts on project 2025:
Understanding the Mandate , What it means to you and how can we grow from learning it.
Stand up for US Department of Education Against Project 2025 Mandates
The future of education is at a crossroads, and the Department of Education plays a vital role in ensuring access to quality learning opportunities for all. However, proposed policies threaten to dismantle essential programs, impacting students, teachers, and communities nationwide. By joining together, we can advocate for a strong, well-supported education system that prioritizes inclusivity, innovation, and success. Whether through raising awareness, participating in discussions, or pushing for informed policies, every effort counts in safeguarding the integrity of public education.
This is a call to action for educators, advocates, and concerned citizens to come together and make a difference. Through collective knowledge and active engagement, we can challenge harmful reforms and champion initiatives that strengthen the Department of Education. The upcoming virtual workshop on April 21-23 will provide key insights into these urgent matters, equipping participants with the tools to take action. Let’s stand for the future of education—because protecting learning today ensures a brighter tomorrow for all. Join us in this mission and help drive meaningful change!
Power Point For 3 Day Workshop 6pm-8pm April 21-23, 2025
Small Call to Action Headline
Small Call to Action Headline
Website Development
Custom Website DesignResponsive Web DevelopmentUser Experience (UX) DesignE-commerce Website DevelopmentContent Management System (CMS) Integration
Dev Development
Full-Stack DevelopmentFrontend DevelopmentBackend DevelopmentAPI Development and IntegrationDatabase Design and Management
Scrum Master Services
Agile Project ManagementScrum Master ConsultationSprint Planning and ExecutionTeam Collaboration and CoordinationContinuous Improvement Strategies
Mobile App Design
iOS App Development
Android App Development
Cross-Platform App Development
Mobile App UI/UX Design
App Maintenance and Support
Online Marketing
Search Engine Optimization (SEO)Social Media MarketingContent MarketingEmail MarketingPay-Per-Click (PPC) Advertising
Drone Services
Aerial Photography and VideographyDrone Mapping and SurveyingInspection and Monitoring ServicesGIS (Geographic Information System) IntegrationCustom Drone Software Development
“ eMillion Concepts. eMillion People. eMillion Solutions.”
© 2024 E-Millions Consulting Services - All Rights Reserved,
etechmilli@gmail.com
(404) 723-3940
© 2025 Company Name - All Rights Reserved, consectetur adipiscing elit. Maecenas commodo suscipit tortor, vel tristique sapien